Attachment - Psychology Essay Example for Free

chemical bond Psychology screenDevelopmentalPsychologyEarly societal DevelopmentAttachmentAttachment An frantic bond amongst twain people. It is a two- steeringprocess that endures all over time. It leads to certain demeanors such as clinging and proximity-seeking andserves the function of defend the infant. Primary adjunct figureThe person who has formed the closest bond with a child, marchd by the enduringness of the relationship. Usuallythe biological mother, but other people butt end fulfil the intent. Learning theoryA group of explanations which explain behavior in termsof learning rather than any inwrought or higher enouncetendencies. mainly apply by behaviourists who rather focustheir explanations purely on what behaviour they observe.Learning schemeClassical Conditioning (Pavlov)Unconditioned Stimulus (US) foodUnconditioned chemical reaction (UR) pleasanceNeutral Stimulus (NS) the feederConditioned Stimulus (CS) food from a feederConditioned Resp onse (CR) pleasure/ fastenerLearning Theory Operant Conditioning Reinforcement When doing something results in a lovableconsequence, the behaviour is to a greater extent(prenominal) likely to be produced. Punishment When doing something results in an unpleasantconsequence, the behaviour is unlikely to be produced. Dollard and Miller (1950) explain holdfast using operant conditioning When an infant is fed it reduces dis informality and pluss pleasure, this serves as a reward and is the primaryreinforcer. The person supplying the food is associatedwith avoiding discomfort and is the source of reward whichbecomes the thirdhand reinforcer. Attachment occursbecause the child seeks the person who supplies thereward.Evaluating the Learning Theory StrengthsIt weed provide adequate explanations of how hampers form. Behaviourists argue that since we atomic number 18 do up of the same building blocks of stimulus/response environments experiments done on animals argon unhazardous t o generalize to human behaviour. Weakness It whitethorn be attention and responsiveness from the apprehensiongiver that is the primary reinforcer, non food. Learning theory is largely base on studies with non-human animals. Human behaviour whitethorn be confusable in many ways but learning theory does non recall higher order thinking and emotions that faeces influence behaviour. Harlow (1959) demonstrated that it is not food but the train of contact and comfort the infant receives that increases adhesiveness levels. The use of young rhesus monkeys were used to demonstrate this. 60 babies were studied in Glasgow and form that addition was higher to the person who was most responsive and who interacted with them to a greater extent (Schaffer and Emerson,1964).Cant explain the greatness of cuttingness in attachment.Bowlbys Attachment Theory (1969) ELEMENTS OF BOWLBYS ATTACHMENT THEORY Attachment is adaptational and innate Bowlbys theory is an evolutionary theory because it sees attachment as a behaviour that adds to its option andultimately its reproductive value. Having attachmentcapabilities is an innate drive, similar to imprinting, that has long term benefits ensuring it stays close to its carry ongiver. oscilloscope on the Theory of Evolution Adaptive behaviours argon behaviours that increase thelikelihood of survival and reproduction. Natural survival is the continuation of these adaptive traits within the animal to increase chances of survival. Sexual selection is the ability to reproduce, not plainly survive. Adaptive genes that lead to bearing traits to assist inreproduction increases sexual selection.Bowlbys Attachment Theory reactive Period A biologically determined period of time during the second quarter of the first year is the most crucial period in which attachments mickle be made. Once missed then it is more difficult for a child to make attachments and demonstrate cordial difficulties. Caregiving is adaptive Not only at tachment but also business organisationgiving is adaptively innate. Social releasers from the infant give signals to the financial aidgiver (smiling, crying, etc) to take make do of it. Attachment is the innate system in babies and caregiving is the innate system in adults. Secure base Having a secure attachment provides a child with a secure base in which to explore the humankind from. It fosters independence, not dependence. Monotropy and power structure Infants form a number of distinct attachments but has one dissolveicular bias towards a genuinely special one called the primary attachment, this is called monotropy. Even with secondary attachments, this hierarchy of attachments recognizes the importance of a primary attachment figure (PAF). The PAF is one that responds most highly sensitively to the childs sociable releasers. Secondary attachments are important, without them, children tend to neglect social skills.Bowlbys Attachment Theory Internal working model A ment al model of the world that enables individuals to predict and control their environment. The internalworking model based on attachment has several(prenominal)consequences In the short-term it gives the child insight into the caregivers behaviour and enables the child to influencethe caregivers behaviour so that a received partnership canbe formed. In the long-term it acts as a template for all prox relationships because it generates expectations close tohow people be retain. The continuity hypothesis The subject that emotionally secure infants go on to beemotionally secure, trusting and socially confident adults.Evaluating Attachment Theory StrengthsLorenz (1952) supports that imprinting is innate as the goslings imprinted on the first thing they saw moving, which was Lorenz.Research shows that once the sensitive period has passed and no attachments are formed, children break social difficulties with peers. If attachment and caregiving are an important biological function as Bo wlby suggests then they would be tack together universally. Tronick et al (1992) studied an African tribe in congou tea and anchor despite tribal responsibleness for raising kids a PAF is present. This is also evidence of monotropy.Schaffer and Emerson found that the more quickly a caregiver responded to a childs needs and the more interaction they had led to a stronger level of attachment. This interaction is important as it is not enough to train something to cuddle but to actually be cuddled back builds a stronger attachment.The Minnesota longitudinal theme (2005) found that continuity among early attachment and subsequent emotional/social behaviour. Infants assort as secure were subsequent rated highest for social competence, less isolated, more empathetic and more popular.Evaluating Attachment Theory Weaknesses Multiple attachments, according to psychologists, are as equally important. There are no primary or secondaryattachments, all attachments are integrated into on e singleworking model. However, a review the look into points to thehierarchical model as being predominant (Prior and Glaser,2006).An alternative explanation to the continuity hypothesis exists, cognise as the temperament hypothesis. This is the belief that children form secure attachments simply because they defecate a more abstemious temperament from birth, whereas more innately difficult children a more likely to form insecure attachments. The infants sullen characteristics shapes a mothers level of responsiveness. Thomas and Chess (1977) identified infant personality types as easy, difficult and slow-to-warm-up. Belsky and Rovine (1987) found a link between physiological behaviours and later attachments types. The more calm and less anxious (aspects of temperament) an infant was the more likely they were to develop secure attachments.Types of Attachment The Strange Situation (Ainsworth and Wittig, 1969)http//www.youtube.com/watch?v=QTsewNrHUHU end to see how infants behave under situations of attemptwith the introduction of a stranger and the insularism ofthe upraise. This tests stranger perplexity and separationanxiety and also the infants willingness to explore with its secure base.Procedure a 99 query manner marked off into 16 squareswas used. The procedure consists of 8 episodesMEMORISE THEMData is collected by a group of observers that recordedwhat the infant was doing every 15 seconds. Observernoted the type of behaviour and level of intensity on ascale of 1-7.Types of Attachment The Strange Situation Findings Ainsworthcombined information from several studies tomake 106 middle-class infants observed.Similarities and differences were found in the waythe infants behaved. In terms of similarities, it wasnoted that episode 2 onwards exploratorybehaviour decreased succession crying increased.Proximity-seeking and contact-maintainingincreased during separation and when strangerappeared. Finally, contact-resisting and proximityavoiding behavi ours seldom occurred towards the caregiver prior to separation.Types of Attachment The Strange Situation FindingsAinsworth found differences in three main types of children. Insecure-avoidant this is a style of attachment characterising those children that tend to avoid social interaction and liaison with others. Secure attachment this is a strong and contented attachment of an infant to his or her caregiver which develops as a result of sensitive responding by the caregiver to the infants needs.Insecure- kind this is a style of ambivalent attachment characterisingchildren who both seek and reject intimacy and social interaction.Main and Solomon (1986) re-analysed the strange situation video tapes and created a fourth attachment typeInsecure-disorganised these infants lack a coherent and consistent strategy for dealing with the stress of separation.Secure% of infants(Ainsworth, 1978)% of infants (VanIjzendoorn et , 1999)InsecureavoidantInsecureresistantInsecuredisorganised66%22%12% XXX62%15%9%15%Evaluating Types of Attachment StrengthsAinsworths Strange Situation technique has given psychologists a means to under substantiate and psychoanalyze attachment which can lead to new future findings. Intervention strategies have been developed to strengthen caregiving behaviour and attachments types. The Circle of Security Project (Cooper et al, 2005) which t severallyes caregivers to recognise signs of distress showed a decrease in disordered caregiving and an increase in secure attachment types.It has proven to be experimentally valid as its construct validness has been demonstrated by other studies supporting the four types of attachments and its predictive validity has been demonstrated in correlation coefficients between early attachment types and later behaviours. Its findings are also consistent which makes them reliable. Using interobserver reliablity methods, Ainsworth found almost finished agreement at . 94 between the raters (1.0 is perfect). Weakness Or does it lack validity, because it is intended to measure the attachment type of an infant, BUT does it really simply measure the pure tone of a particular relationship? Main and Weston (1981) claim it is measuring one relationship instead of something innate within an individual. Evaluating Types of Attachment Effects of attachment types Bowlbys continuity hypothesis would predict that a childs behaviour later in life would be terminationed by specificattachment types they develop. Prior and Glaser (2006) found that in later childhood, if as infants they developed a secure attachment type, they wouldbe less emotionally dependent and possess moreinterpersonal harmony. Infants with the other three typeswould be more aggressive, negative withdrawn in laterchildhood. It would also effect you in your adult romantic lives as well. Hazen and Shaver (1987) conducted the Love Quiz whichasked questions active early experiences and current loveexperiences and found that there were characte risticpatterns of later romantic behaviour associated with eachearly attachment type.Evaluating Types of Attachment Factors that influence attachment type aesthesia Ainsworth developed the Maternal Sensitivity Scale to rate mothers behaviour such as sensitivity and insensitivity to infants signals. The scale found hard disposed infantObservedMothers bxIn firmlyattached infantAvoidant infantResistant infantmore sensitive,cooperatingUnresponsive tocrying lessaffectionateMore rejecting andless attentiongivingPreoccupied with practise activities whenholding infantMaternal reflective functioning Some studies have shown low correlations between measures of sensitivity and strength of attachment. Slade et al (2005) found the ability to understand what someone else is thinking or feeling may be more important.Temperament May play a role as previous look for indicates, but it is unclear. cultural Variations in Attachment KNOW the definitions of civilization, culturalvariations and the dif ference betweenindividualistic and socialistic cultures (pg.45) Cross-cultural Similarities AinsworthsUganda landing field (1967) Tronick et al (1992) study on the African tribe inZaire Fox (1977) infants in Isreali kibbutz raised bynurses when tested in the Strange Situationappeared equally attached to both caregivers,except in the reunion behaviour where theyshowed greater attachment to their mothers.Cultural Variations in Attachment Cross-cultural Differences Grossman and Grossman (1991) found that German infants appear more insecurely attached rather than secure. This may be due to the different childrearing practices as German culture involves keeping some interpersonal distance from the parent and infant. Takahashi (1990) used the Strange Situation on a group of 60 middle-class infants in lacquer and found similar rates of secure attachment. However, the infants showed no evidence of insecure-avoidant and high rates of insecureresistance (32%). Different childrearing practi ces can explain the difference for in Japan the infants are rarely ever separated from their parents which is wherefore they would be more distressed than their American counterparts. Conclusions These studies suggest that the strongest attachments are still formed with their mothers and that there are differences in attachment that can be have-to doe withd to differences in cultural attitudes. Meta-analysis study by Van IJzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988) examined over 2000 Strange Situation classification studies in 8 countries. They found the variation between countries and culture were nice with secure attachment being the most common in all countries followed by insecure-avoidant except in Japan and Israel. Variations within cultures however were greater. In conclusion the findings appear to be similar to that found in the US and this supports the view that attachment is an innate and biological process. Also entropy collected on different subcultures should not be generalis ed to be representative of a particular culture.Criticisms of Research on CulturalVariations Culture biasRothbaum et al (2000) argued that attachment theory and investigate is not relevant to other countries because it is root in American culture. For example, the sensitivity hypothesis reflects western ideas of autonomy whereas in Japan sensitivity is about promoting dependence. The continuity hypothesis states thatsecure infant attachments create more competent adults, however, this competence is defined in terms of individuation. The secure base hypothesis in the west explains secure attached infants as autarkical and confident exploring whereas in Japan theypromote dependence and the concept of amae and so this canexplain why insecure-resistant behaviours are more typical.Rothbaum concludes that psychologists should produce a set of indigenous theories that are explanations of attachment that are grow in individual cultures with a small group of universal principles (infant ne ed for protection) but mostly with childcare practices relating to cultural values.Rothbaum was challenged by Posada and Jacobs (2001) whichshows that attachment theory does apply to most cultures.Criticisms of Research on CulturalVariations Criticisms of cross-cultural investigate Testsof procedures used may not be equally validin the country and may make the culture appearinferior or abnormal. This is an example ofimposed etic. This is when a inquiry method isused in one culture even thought it was designed tobe used in another (intelligence tests or observations). The group that was tested may not berepresentative of the culture and yet researchersmight make generalisations about the whole cultureor even the whole country. din of Attachment Effects of SeparationSpitz and Wolf (1946) observed 100 children in an universe became severely gloomy after a few months.Skeels and Dye (1939) found similar children scored lower on intelligence tests.Bifulo et al (1992) found that negat ive effectuate of de want may occur later in life. When 249 women who had lost their mothers out front they were 17 were studied, it was found that they were twice as likely to develop depressive/anxiety disorders later in life.Robertsons (1967-73) made films observing the effects of separation in childrenWhen given a high level of emotional care and similar structures to that of their family life, the children exhibited some signs of distress, however, slept well and did not reject their PAF when they were reunited. Some were even reluctant to part with the foster mother which is a sign of a good emotional bond.John, however, was in a babys room and not given such attention. He became withdrawn and gave up on proximity seeking bx. When he was reunited with his mother he rejected her for months and demonstrated outbursts of anger towards her. upset of Attachment Physical and Emotional Disruption As the research evidence shows differences in the way physical and emotional attenti on is given can producenegative effects in children. However, there are studiesthat show these ill effects can be reversed. Sigvardsson (1979) studied over 600 choose children in Sweden and at the season of eleven, 26% of them wereclassified as problem children. However in a follow up study, ten years later they were no worse off than theaver be on population. So when alternative emotional care is provided, ill effects of separation can be reversed. However, for somechildren disruption of attachment leads to permanentdifficulties. To criticise the validity of the research consider that they are based on case studies. Weakness of case studies arethat they are based on generalisations and they depend onobjectivity of the observers and are prone to observer bias.Failure to Form Attachment free children Privation is the lack of having any attachments due to the failure todevelop such attachments early in life. djinnThe Czech twinsLocked in a room by her father until she was 13. When discovered she could not stand erect or speak. She was disinterested in people and never recovered socially.Locked away by their step-mother until the age of 7. Were looked after by their sisters and by 14 had normal social and intellectual capabilities. By 20 they had supra average intelligence andexcellent social skills.EvaluationWas unclear whether or not Genie was decelerate at birth or if she ever formed an attachment with her mother. The Czech twins may have formed attachments to each other to compensate for complete lack of care. It is difficult to reach firm conclusions based on only these cases.Failure to Form Attachment Institutional CareMultiple studies show that the effects of institutionalisation within children is acute distress.Longitudinal studies have been conducted to see what long term effects arecaused by institutionalisation.Hodges and Tizard (1989) followed a group of 65 British children from early life to adolescence. Children have been place in an instituti on from in the first place they were 4 months old. Children have not yet formed attachments at this age. An early study found that 70% of the children were not able to care deeply for anyone.The children were assessed regularly up to the age of 16. Some children remained while most were adopted or restored with their original families. The restored children were less likely to develop an attachment with their mothers but the adopted ones were as closely attached to their adopted parents as the control group. However, both groups had problems with peers and showed signs of disinhibited attachment.These findings suggest that early privation had negative effects on the ability to form relationships even when given good subsequent emotional care. If failure to develop attachments after the sensitive period occur it can have an irreversible effect on emotional development.Failure to Form Attachment Effects of Privation and Institutionalisation Attachment disorder This has been accepted as a psychiatric condition and has been included in the DSMIV. There are two kinds of attachment disorder, inhibited and disinhibited. Children with an attachment disorder have no PAF, cant interact or relate to others before the age of 5 and have experienced severe neglect or frequent changes in caregivers. lamentable parenting skills Harlows monkeys that were raised with surrogate mothers went on to become poor parents. Also, Quinton et al (1984) found similar findings when he compared 50 women who had been raised in institutions. When the women were in their 20s the ex-institutionalised mothers were experiencing extremedifficulties acting as parents. departure dwarfism Physical evidence by Gardner (1972) that institutionalised children are physically underdeveloped, potentially caused by stress hormones. Evaluation In the study of Romanian children, one-third recovered well despite not establishing a PAF prior to the sensitive period. Therefore, privation alone cannot explain negative outcomes. This suggests that damage occurs when there are duple risk factors (Turner and Lloyd, 1995). Not sure if the children failed to form attachments early in life. Maybe they did and the problems they experienced later were more colligate to rejection.Impact of solar day CareDay Care the form of temporary care not given by the family or someone well known to the child and usually outside of the home.Social development the aspect of a childs growth concerned with the development of sociability, where the child learns to relate to others and with the process of socialisation, the child learns social skills appropriate to the society. Negative effects on social development Meta-analysis from findings of 88 studies supports Bowlbys research that prolonged separation from the PAF leads to maladjustment. Violata and Russell (1994) concluded that regular twenty-four hour period care for more than 20 hrs a week had an unmistakable negative effect on socio-emotional dev elopment, behaviour and attachment of young children. NICHD in USA conducted a longitudinal study of over 1000 children. Parents were interviewed regarding the effects of regular day care. The study showedthat the more time a child spent in day care, regardless of quality, the adults rated them as more disobedient and aggressive (NICHD, 2003). The children in day care were 3 times more likely to demonstrate behavioural problems than children that were cared by their mothers. Melhuish (2004) found evidence that children with high levels of day care in the first two years of development had elevated risks of developing anti-social behaviours. The Minnesota longitudinal study demonstrated the more securely attached infants are the more popular with peers they become. So therefore, the more insecure an infant, more peer related problems could be expected. Belsky and Rovine (1988) assessed attachment in children in day care and found that were more likely to be insecurely attached compar ed to children at home.Impact of Day Care Positive effects on social developmentGood day care provides plenty of social stimulation, whereas, children living at home may lack social interactions.Brown and Harris (1978) found depressed mothers contributedtheir low moods to being isolated at home with children.Depressed mothers are likely to form insecure attachments with their children which would have a negative effect on their children. Therefore, the independence gained with having a child in day care is a way to prevent this.Clarke-Stewart et al (1994) studied 150 children and found they were consistently more compliant and independent.The EPPE followed 3000 children in pre-schools and foundincreased sociability (Sylvia et al, 2003).Day care exposes children to their peers thus enabling them to develop socialstrategies (negotiate and make friends). Field (1991) found a positive correlation between the amount of time in day care and the number of friends children have once they en ter school. Also, those that started day care before 6 months were more sociable than those that started later.Evaluating Research on Day Care Weaknesses of research on day careWhen evaluating the research, one must consider the constituent under which one can find positive or negativeoutcomes.Prodromidis (1995) found no correlation between Swedish children in day care and aggression.Freidman from NICHD explains the aggression study actually shows that day care children may be more aggressive than non-day care, but still 83% of children in day care between 10 -30 hours a week show no signs of aggression.Second important finding from the NICHD research is that the mothers sensitivity to the child, higher maternal education and income all play a more important role in decreased behavioural problems than the amount of time in day care.Finally, the findings are not causal. The data cannot show that day care caused aggression only that there is a link between the two. Therefore, the data suggests that childrens development is more strongly affected by factors at home than those in day care (Belsky et al, 2007).Evaluating Research on Day Care Weaknesses of Research on Day Care Cannot apply a cause relating to peer relations aswell, only a link. For example, shy and unsociablechildren have mothers that are shy andunsociable, therefore, its possible that moreoutgoing parents/children that go to day care. A lot of research supports the idea that day carealone has no direct effect on development andthat there are other factors involved. Gregg et al(2005) analysed findings from the Children of the90s study and concluded that for the majority ofchildren, maternal employment in their first 3years of life had no adverse effects on behaviour.Evaluating Research on Day Care Mediating FactorsQuality of CareIndividual DifferencesAs the quality of care decreases it is expected that the attachment type will become poorer. NICHD study (1997) found that low-quality care was associa ted with poor social development. As parents have different interests in their child, day care mental faculty are less invested and therefore provide a different kind of attention. This is reflected in Howes and Hamilton (1992) findingsthat secure attachmentsoccurred in only 50% of day care staff but 70% in mothers.The NICHD study found the more secure a childs attachment level is the better they cope with time spent in day care. However, another study showed that insecure children coped better than secure children (showed more aggressive bx) in day care.Childs age and number of hoursGregg et al (2005) found that negative effects were more likely to be found in children starting day care before 18 months of age. However, the magnitude of these effects was small.Clarke-Stewart et al (1994) found no difference in attachment between spending a lot of time in day care (more than 30 hours) with those that spend a little time (less than 10 hours).Implications of Research intoAttachment a nd Day care Attachment Research Attachment research has shown that when separation occurs, negative effects of this separation can be avoided if substitute emotional care can be provided and links to the PAF are made available. This research has changed the way hospitals handle visiting arrangements and the way institutional care is provided. A second implication is the way the adoptions process is managed allowing babies to be adopted earlier strengthening child/parent attachments (Singer, 1985). Another implication is the cash advance of parenting skills, ie, Circle of Security, which improves infant/mother relationships. Finally, attachment research has been used to improve day care quality focusing on the importance of secondary attachment figures. Day Care Research As research shows, high quality care leads to positive outcomes. What is highquality care? Low child-staff ratios 31 is ideal for sensitive care to be given Minimal staff turnover allows for consistent care an d decreases anxiety subtle emotional care only 23% of carers demonstrated highly sensitive care, 50% was moderate care and 20% were emotionally detached. Qualified staff qualified managers lead to better social development To warrant high-quality care, legal standards are implemented relating to staff ratio to age of the child, minimum qualifications of staff, Ofsted inspections and finally the sure out programme.