AB 109 and Institutional Corrections Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

AB 109 and Institutional Corrections - examine ExampleThe menu provided guidelines to be used in decongesting the state prisons and at the same time increase capacity within county prisons.California has 33 state prisons which initially had exceeded its capacity by more than century%. The main goal of the California department of corrections and rehabilitation was to ensure public safety by preventing crime and realizing social responsibilities (Misczynski, 2011). The adult department had three major departments which was the male department, female department and the battle cry department. The number of parole violators and recidivist prisoners was adding to the oergrowing population among prisoners. The population prevents effective service delivery and prevents effective healthcare delivery (Lofstrom et al. 2012). The increased population prompted the state prisons this release offenders before their time elapses. The county prisons had limited jurisdiction over felony offend ers and parole violators.The assembly bill (AB 109), was enacted to expand the jurisdiction of county court to enable them deal with cases that were initially charge to the state courts. This was an effort by the state of California to change the manner in which adult punitory facilities were managed. The decongestion programs aimed at reducing the number of inmate in state detention facilities and accommodate them in the solid ground facilities. According to Lofstrom et al. (2012) the bill was a move by the California to decongest the 33 state prisons by just about 137.5%. The bill was an effort of by a taskforce which recommended the decongestion. In 2011 the recommendations by the task force were implemented. The assembly bill also allowed low- felony offenders to serve their jail term in country prisons rather than the state prisons.The state prisons where to work the inmate population. No inmate was to be transferred to the county prisons upon the implementation of the bil l. In that sense no prison would be released prior to his